ABRSM  
Search the forum

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Forums Rules

A shortened version of the Forums Rules is given below. The full version can be found here.

By maintaining a user account and by posting to these forums, you hereby agree to abide by these rules.

FORUMS RULES - A SNAPSHOT
- Stay safe - protect your privacy and respect the privacy of others
- No abusive, offensive or aggressive postings
- No insults or personal attacks
- No foul language
- No trolling
- No inappropriate or illegal material
- No advertising (including "For Sale" or "Wanted" adverts)
- No crossposting
- No forum spamming
- No defamatory comments
- Avoid using jargon, abbreviations or "text talk"

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> New Abrsm Edition Of Beethoven's Sonatas, A specific question
Jennyanydots
post Nov 7 2009, 04:56 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 56253



Please could someone who has this edition (the one edited by Barry Cooper) look something up for me? It’s the first movement of Sonata no 5 (Op 10 #1 in C minor), bars 158-167. Is there any indication in the score that the RH crotchets should be detached? Does it say anything about articulation and phrasing of this passage in the notes?

My old ABRSM edition (Craxton and Tovey) has two phrase marks covering bars 158-162 and 162-167 and no staccato marks, implying everything should be played legato. However the notes say “The bass will mark its rhythm with a soft drum-like staccato while the chords above are detached gently with singing tone, sospirando.” This seems to contradict what is written in the score. Perhaps Craxton and Tovey disagreed about it?

I’ve just listened to Barenboim, Brendel, and Arrau playing it on Youtube. The first two play this passage staccato and Arrau plays it “detached gently”. I have also just discovered Andras Schiff’s lecture on this sonata on the Guardian website. He talks about this passage being “secco - very dry” and plays it almost staccatissimo – but I definitely don’t like his interpretation overall.

I’m hoping someone might find something in the new edition which would explain why Tovey, Brendel et al think it should be played staccato/"detached gently".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sbhoa
post Nov 7 2009, 05:30 PM
Post #2


Maestro
******

Group: Members
Posts: 12713
Joined: 31-October 03
From: Tameside
Member No.: 24



"The absence of any legato indication here suggests the upbeat chords should be light and slightly detached from the downbeats".
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jennyanydots
post Nov 7 2009, 05:43 PM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 56253



QUOTE(sbhoa @ Nov 7 2009, 05:30 PM) *

"The absence of any legato indication here suggests the upbeat chords should be light and slightly detached from the downbeats".


Thanks very much, sbhoa. That's very helpful. Presumably there is no slur across bars 158-162?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sbhoa
post Nov 7 2009, 07:50 PM
Post #4


Maestro
******

Group: Members
Posts: 12713
Joined: 31-October 03
From: Tameside
Member No.: 24



QUOTE(Jennyanydots @ Nov 7 2009, 05:43 PM) *

QUOTE(sbhoa @ Nov 7 2009, 05:30 PM) *

"The absence of any legato indication here suggests the upbeat chords should be light and slightly detached from the downbeats".


Thanks very much, sbhoa. That's very helpful. Presumably there is no slur across bars 158-162?

None at all.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · Viva Piano · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 03:54 AM