Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Forums Rules

A shortened version of the Forums Rules is given below. The full version can be found here.

By maintaining a user account and by posting to these forums, you hereby agree to abide by these rules.

FORUMS RULES - A SNAPSHOT
- Stay safe - protect your privacy and respect the privacy of others
- No abusive, offensive or aggressive postings
- No insults or personal attacks
- No foul language
- No trolling
- No inappropriate or illegal material
- No advertising (including "For Sale" or "Wanted" adverts)
- No crossposting
- No forum spamming
- No defamatory comments
- Avoid using jargon, abbreviations or "text talk"

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Digital Pianos, Entry level recommendations
flobiano
post May 22 2012, 12:25 PM
Post #16


Prodigy
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1434
Joined: 27-August 09
Member No.: 73855



QUOTE(Seer_Green @ May 22 2012, 09:57 AM) *

I would still maintain that a good digital is always better than a bad acoustic.


True, but I think a decent acoustic is still usually better than a good digital. But that is personal preference, I know I would rather have my 30 year old acoustic than any digital that I've ever tried. But there are other advantages to digitals such as not needing to get them tuned/ maintained and being able to plug ear phones in.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Seer_Green
post May 22 2012, 12:27 PM
Post #17


Virtuoso
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 3078
Joined: 18-July 10
From: Bucks is in the distance...
Member No.: 114670



QUOTE(flobiano @ May 22 2012, 01:25 PM) *

QUOTE(Seer_Green @ May 22 2012, 09:57 AM) *

I would still maintain that a good digital is always better than a bad acoustic.

True, but I think a decent acoustic is still usually better than a good digital. But that is personal preference, I know I would rather have my 30 year old acoustic than any digital that I've ever tried. But there are other advantages to digitals such as not needing to get them tuned/ maintained and being able to plug ear phones in.

Totally agree, but I suppose if someone's going to go out and spend ?500, I'd rather they spent it on a decent digital rather than what might be termed a 'pub' piano, which probably needs several hundred spend on it to make it playable. There are of course bargain seocndhand acoustics to be had at the same price.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dolce@piano
post May 22 2012, 01:10 PM
Post #18


Prodigy
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1575
Joined: 26-November 08
Member No.: 46163



QUOTE(A.U.K @ May 21 2012, 09:11 PM) *

QUOTE(oldromola @ May 21 2012, 12:23 PM) *

I have pointed out that an acoustic piano would be the best thing but they are adamant that they want a digital piano..

They are right to be adamant in my humble opinion! Of course a Steinway grand piano sounds better than any digital, but for 99.9% of us the way forward is via the latter.


I am not entirely sure how to take your response..why are they right to be adamant.? I was not for one moment suggesting that they purchase a Steinway Grand but feel as many Piano teachers do that an acoustic piano would be preferable if possible which in this instance it is. I am not suggesting that digital pianos don't have a place and they are much improved but for what they cost a good secondhand acoustic piano could easily be bought. There's not a lot of difference size wise and to me it seems sensible to learn on a more traditional piano..

Thanks to all for the suggestions I will pass them on..

Andrew


I don't really believe in being 'adamant' one way of the other but, as a piano teacher, I usually recommend digital pianos as opposed to acoustic pianos.

Leaving aside quality for price arguments, it's mainly to due to experience to do with house lay-outs and family dynamics.

Purely personally, we have quite a large house with a lovely huge, double height ceiling living room at one end. For three years we had the loan of a gorgeous grand piano in this room.

Mu husband is diploma level, me a bit lower, one son was about grade 5/6 and the other about grade 2/3.

And practically no one used that piano (apart from my husband sometimes). It filled the house. Even at the other end, you couldn't 'get away' from it.
My younger son, as the 'weakest' player, absolutely refused to play it - because everyone would hear him. Older son liked to practise at 7 in the morning so that didn't work. No one could watch TV if someone was playing. My husband practises 'properly' - 15 minutes going over and over the same 8 bars - it drove us mad, like getting caught in a time loop.
But the Yamaha clavinova got excellent daily use . . .

.


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sbhoa
post May 22 2012, 02:45 PM
Post #19


Maestro
******

Group: Members
Posts: 18930
Joined: 31-October 03
From: Tameside
Member No.: 24



QUOTE(dolce@piano @ May 22 2012, 02:10 PM) *

Purely personally, we have quite a large house with a lovely huge, double height ceiling living room at one end. For three years we had the loan of a gorgeous grand piano in this room.

Mu husband is diploma level, me a bit lower, one son was about grade 5/6 and the other about grade 2/3.

And practically no one used that piano (apart from my husband sometimes). It filled the house. Even at the other end, you couldn't 'get away' from it.
My younger son, as the 'weakest' player, absolutely refused to play it - because everyone would hear him. Older son liked to practise at 7 in the morning so that didn't work. No one could watch TV if someone was playing. My husband practises 'properly' - 15 minutes going over and over the same 8 bars - it drove us mad, like getting caught in a time loop.
But the Yamaha clavinova got excellent daily use . . .

.

Interesting that in a musical family hearing other people practising is not just a part of normal life.
I just get on with it and don't think about others hearing. It's what I need to do and my children grew up used to hearing practice.
You couldn't shut of other instruments so easily.... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A.U.K
post May 22 2012, 03:47 PM
Post #20


Prodigy
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1629
Joined: 17-April 07
Member No.: 10759



Well thank you all very much for your suggestions I will had them on and having read the various posts here I can see the advantages of the digital piano as the player can plug in and let everyone else get on with things undisturbed. I was rather taken aback by their determination to have a digital piano as they are not musical people and I think know little to nothing at all about instruments which was why I was so surprised at their adamant stance against acoustic pianos..It seems that digital pianos are very popular these days..

I was always of the belief that acoustic pianos were preferred but it seems not and demonstrates how far digital pianos have come since the early days..

Much obliged to you all..

Andrew
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
GMc
post May 23 2012, 11:59 AM
Post #21


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 374
Joined: 27-September 11
Member No.: 322722



We have both. A restored turn of century Allison grand and a roland f110. The restoration was about 40 years ago but it is still going pretty much ok. Grand is played every day. With lid down it doesnt overwhelm the house and we all prefer playing it. But the liberace white number travels around very well. Usually lives at grandmas flat where size is perfect, goes on holidays locally, goes into kids room during school hols. I dont choose to play it personally but the special effects are popular, as are the recording features and the headphones are great for unsocial hours if you have close neighbours. And its so neat. They didnt have black on offer but white grows on you. Nightmare to put together single handed on xmas eve mind you. Stool is snazzy. As they have superceded that model you might get a bargain on one of those.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SomePianist
post May 23 2012, 01:38 PM
Post #22


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 10-May 04
From: Oxford, UK
Member No.: 1318



I would suggest the Roland HP-307. I own one and continue to be surprised at how realistic the action is compared with a real grand piano.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dulcet
post May 23 2012, 03:34 PM
Post #23


Prodigy
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1233
Joined: 6-July 10
Member No.: 112579



QUOTE(SomePianist @ May 23 2012, 02:38 PM) *

I would suggest the Roland HP-307. I own one and continue to be surprised at how realistic the action is compared with a real grand piano.


I agree that the Roland touch is better than the Yamaha, but the sound isn't for me. (caveat - IANAPianist but I lived for a long time with a grand piano...)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
PianissiMole
post May 24 2012, 08:37 AM
Post #24


Prodigy
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1313
Joined: 17-December 08
From: southampton
Member No.: 48788



QUOTE(Dulcet @ May 23 2012, 04:34 PM) *

QUOTE(SomePianist @ May 23 2012, 02:38 PM) *

I would suggest the Roland HP-307. I own one and continue to be surprised at how realistic the action is compared with a real grand piano.


I agree that the Roland touch is better than the Yamaha, but the sound isn't for me. (caveat - IANAPianist but I lived for a long time with a grand piano...)


I find the Roland touch is quite good (although I would not describe it as realistic in comparison with a grand) and the sound (Roland FP7) is acceptable (I use headphones almost exclusively and rarely play it on the speakers).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SomePianist
post May 24 2012, 02:50 PM
Post #25


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 118
Joined: 10-May 04
From: Oxford, UK
Member No.: 1318



QUOTE(PianissiMole @ May 24 2012, 09:37 AM) *

QUOTE(Dulcet @ May 23 2012, 04:34 PM) *

QUOTE(SomePianist @ May 23 2012, 02:38 PM) *

I would suggest the Roland HP-307. I own one and continue to be surprised at how realistic the action is compared with a real grand piano.


I agree that the Roland touch is better than the Yamaha, but the sound isn't for me. (caveat - IANAPianist but I lived for a long time with a grand piano...)


I find the Roland touch is quite good (although I would not describe it as realistic in comparison with a grand) and the sound (Roland FP7) is acceptable (I use headphones almost exclusively and rarely play it on the speakers).


The model I mentioned has their latest revision of the keyboard, the PHA III. I'm not sure about their other models but that one is pretty good. Agree that the sound is not all that I want it to be, but I have played a LOT worse digitals for far more money.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sunil
post May 24 2012, 03:02 PM
Post #26


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 204
Joined: 7-February 11
From: Peckham :) London
Member No.: 205779



That's the latest model, the Roland Supernatural piano. Roland claims, this has the same touch of V-Piano. Ours is the stage version of this, which is FP7-F.

QUOTE(SomePianist @ May 24 2012, 03:50 PM) *

The model I mentioned has their latest revision of the keyboard, the PHA III. I'm not sure about their other models but that one is pretty good. Agree that the sound is not all that I want it to be, but I have played a LOT worse digitals for far more money.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · Viva Piano · Next Newest »
 

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 01:31 AM