Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Forum Rules

A shortened version of the Forums Rules is given below. The full version can be found here.

By maintaining a user account and by posting to these forums, you hereby agree to abide by these rules.

FORUMS RULES - A SNAPSHOT
- Stay safe - protect your privacy and respect the privacy of others
- No abusive, offensive or aggressive postings
- No insults or personal attacks
- No foul language
- No trolling
- No inappropriate or illegal material
- No advertising (including "For Sale" or "Wanted" adverts)
- No crossposting
- No forum spamming
- No defamatory comments
- Avoid using jargon, abbreviations or "text talk"

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> G # Minor Or A Flat Min?
stratlg
post Jun 30 2007, 01:01 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 5-June 07
Member No.: 11843



Hello all! I'm designing a scale book and I'm wondering if there is a standard upon which music publishers rely as far as deciding which name a scale receives? Is it equally acceptable to name a scale G# Minor as it is A Flat Minor? It seems like an arbitrary decision, so I am just going to pick A Flat Minor... is this something I should be concerned with?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
teenviolinist
post Jun 30 2007, 01:19 PM
Post #2


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 25-June 07
Member No.: 12445



It has to be G# minor, I can't remember why, my violin teacher told me when I asked why the scale book writers didn't write it as A flat minor because I found that easier... I'll ask her and tell you... something like A flat minor and G# minor are actually not enharmonically related and the relative key of A flat minor is C flat major with 7 flats. I think its all about both ease of reading for the player and musical details and when there's a dispute between the two, details comes first....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stratlg
post Jun 30 2007, 01:36 PM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 5-June 07
Member No.: 11843



QUOTE(noodle @ Jun 30 2007, 01:14 PM) *

It's more likely to be G#minor because it is the relative minor of Bmajor and has 5 sharps. If you call it Ab minor, then it's relative major would be Cb major and that's more awkward from the key signature point of view. In most scale books, it's called G# minor and it says enharmonic Ab in brackets beside it.


Thanks for the reply! Fantastic point... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
teenviolinist
post Jun 30 2007, 04:14 PM
Post #4


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 25-June 07
Member No.: 12445



QUOTE(noodle @ Jun 30 2007, 04:30 PM) *

QUOTE(teenviolinist @ Jun 30 2007, 02:19 PM) *

.. something like A flat minor and G# minor are actually not enharmonically related
Sorry, but they are. G# is the enharmonic equivalent of Ab!


Yes I know... like I said I can't remember exactly what my teacher told me.. obviously it wasn't that (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kenm
post Jun 30 2007, 08:17 PM
Post #5


Virtuoso
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2785
Joined: 9-September 04
Member No.: 2075



QUOTE(stratlg @ Jun 30 2007, 02:01 PM) *
Hello all! I'm designing a scale book and I'm wondering if there is a standard upon which music publishers rely as far as deciding which name a scale receives? Is it equally acceptable to name a scale G# Minor as it is A Flat Minor? It seems like an arbitrary decision, so I am just going to pick A Flat Minor... is this something I should be concerned with?

In this household we agree that it is just as acceptable to name G# minor G# minor as it is to name Ab minor Ab minor. Both scales exist, but only on fixed tuning instruments do they have to sound the same. Personally, I find it somewhat surprising that people would rather cope with Fx than with Cb and Fb. Why don't you put both scales in your book? Your complete set would be Cb major to C# major and their relative minors.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sarah-flute
post Jun 30 2007, 08:27 PM
Post #6


Maestro
******

Group: Members
Posts: 25735
Joined: 14-December 04
From: Insomniaville
Member No.: 2729



I've always thought of G# minor as Ab minor on the piano - but neither name bothers me. I know what's being asked for whichever equivalent is used. After all, unless one is reading from the printed music, on an untunable instrument like the piano, it makes zero difference to the notes one plays.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
andante_in_c
post Jun 30 2007, 09:03 PM
Post #7


Maestro
******

Group: Members
Posts: 10320
Joined: 15-November 03
From: Hampshire, UK
Member No.: 130



The Trinity Guildhall Grade 6 recorder syllabus asks for Ab, rather than G# minor. I suspect this is because the scale/arpeggio on an F instrument is fingered the same way as Eb minor on a C instrument, and it is therefore less confusing to think of it by its flat name.

My candidate this week had a total blind spot about this scale, and, as she was trying to work out what to play, could hear the examiner muttering under his breath, 'Why have they called it Ab minor? It should be G# minor'. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ohmy.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Roseau
post Jun 30 2007, 10:02 PM
Post #8


Virtuoso
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5785
Joined: 29-January 06
Member No.: 6007



I prefer to think about it as Ab because I tend not to think about relative majors/minors but instead think of the major scale and flatten the third (etc.) to turn it into a minor scale. I think this is because when I practised scales on the piano I used to play every possible scale starting on one particular note.

My oboe teacher says that this is a pianist's way of doing things and on a woodwind instrument fingering is more logical (and easier to remember) if you think major/relative minor and it should therefore be G# because it is the relative minor of B major. He is probably right if you are learning them from scratch but I still prefer my way.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
briantrumpet
post Jun 30 2007, 11:10 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 779
Joined: 24-June 07
From: Exeter
Member No.: 12403



You need to know and understand both, so I'd put both in - then people can choose which way they want to learn it. Bass clef tuba players and trombonists will prefer flats .... certainly tuba players usually find it easier initially to think of B major as C-flat major. It also has the advantage that you're looking at naturals for the altered notes in the harmonic and melodic minor scales, rather than double-sharps. Personally, I hate D# minor - I find Eb minor is so much easier to think about.

But the thing is, once you got it under your fingers (whatever the notation looks like) you still need to be able to relate that finger pattern to either notation - shaps or flats. So, as I say, I'd put both in, side-by-side.

Brian
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sbhoa
post Jul 1 2007, 09:11 AM
Post #10


Maestro
******

Group: Members
Posts: 18920
Joined: 31-October 03
From: Tameside
Member No.: 24



QUOTE(kerioboe @ Jun 30 2007, 11:02 PM) *

I prefer to think about it as Ab because I tend not to think about relative majors/minors but instead think of the major scale and flatten the third (etc.) to turn it into a minor scale. I think this is because when I practised scales on the piano I used to play every possible scale starting on one particular note.

My oboe teacher says that this is a pianist's way of doing things and on a woodwind instrument fingering is more logical (and easier to remember) if you think major/relative minor and it should therefore be G# because it is the relative minor of B major. He is probably right if you are learning them from scratch but I still prefer my way.


I'm not sure about it being the pianists way..... or not until about grade 5 at least.
I encourage my students to practice scales in related pairs to cement the idea of the shared key signature.
I only practised by playing everything on a particular starting note when I knew the related keys inside out.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
janexxx
post Jul 1 2007, 09:23 AM
Post #11


Virtuoso
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5049
Joined: 22-January 05
From: Sunny Derbyshire UK
Member No.: 3016



*goes to check Carl Flesch scale book*

G# minor

I guess purely because of the number of #s vs bs in the key signature
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Roseau
post Jul 1 2007, 12:09 PM
Post #12


Virtuoso
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5785
Joined: 29-January 06
Member No.: 6007



QUOTE(sbhoa @ Jul 1 2007, 11:11 AM) *

QUOTE(kerioboe @ Jun 30 2007, 11:02 PM) *

I prefer to think about it as Ab because I tend not to think about relative majors/minors but instead think of the major scale and flatten the third (etc.) to turn it into a minor scale. I think this is because when I practised scales on the piano I used to play every possible scale starting on one particular note.

My oboe teacher says that this is a pianist's way of doing things and on a woodwind instrument fingering is more logical (and easier to remember) if you think major/relative minor and it should therefore be G# because it is the relative minor of B major. He is probably right if you are learning them from scratch but I still prefer my way.


I'm not sure about it being the pianists way..... or not until about grade 5 at least.
I encourage my students to practice scales in related pairs to cement the idea of the shared key signature.
I only practised by playing everything on a particular starting note when I knew the related keys inside out.


You're probably right. I don't really remember how I first learnt scales on the piano but presume I did so by related keys. I was thinking back to the time when I would happily play scales for an hour a day but this was preparing for grade 8.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
fsharpminor
post Jul 2 2007, 07:38 AM
Post #13


Maestro
******

Group: Members
Posts: 12247
Joined: 7-June 06
From: Wirral (originally Keighley, Yorks)
Member No.: 7089



Well there are certainly pieces written in both G#minor and A flat minor (though probably more of the former). I personally find it much easier to read A flat minor than G#minor, though most of the time I prefer sharps!
The A flat minor bit that comes to mind is in the first movement (3rd variation I think)of Beethoven Sonata Op 26, though some editions just have it in 4 flats and turn it to minor by accidentals. My version is in 7 flats.
Of course the tonality of the piece is A flat so they would never publish it in G#minor.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
janexxx
post Jul 2 2007, 05:00 PM
Post #14


Virtuoso
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5049
Joined: 22-January 05
From: Sunny Derbyshire UK
Member No.: 3016



Maybe it is always G# minor so the student can't crack that joke about a piano down a mine-shaft.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cyrilla
post Jul 2 2007, 10:08 PM
Post #15


Maestro
******

Group: Members
Posts: 11905
Joined: 9-November 03
From: Croydon, South London/Surrey
Member No.: 99



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · Theory and Composition · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 11:39 PM