A shortened version of the Forums Rules is given below. The full version can be found here.
By maintaining a user account and by posting to these forums, you hereby agree to abide by these rules.
FORUMS RULES - A SNAPSHOT
- Stay safe - protect your privacy and respect the privacy of others
- No abusive, offensive or aggressive postings
- No insults or personal attacks
- No foul language
- No trolling
- No inappropriate or illegal material
- No advertising (including "For Sale" or "Wanted" adverts)
- No crossposting
- No forum spamming
- No defamatory comments
- Avoid using jargon, abbreviations or "text talk"
![]() ![]() |
| Garkleine |
Oct 11 2007, 07:55 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 580 Joined: 30-November 03 From: NorthWest England Member No.: 216 |
I have just started using the new flute exam books with some pupils and we have begun with A1:Greensleeves. However on playing it through I realized that it didn't have enough G#s in ,or to put it another way, as many as I am used to hearing. The Greensleeves in the Abracadabra Book is identical apart from the number of G#s.
Has anybody else noticed a problem with the G#s? As I am used to hearing the version with "extra" G#s the exam book sounds a little bit wrong at the moment. Maybe I need to re-educate my ears! But also I wouldn't want an examiner to think that pupils had missed out the G#s and mark them down if they were only playing what was written. Any flute teachers got an opinion on this please! Thanks (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) |
| salrec |
Oct 11 2007, 08:16 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 591 Joined: 10-July 06 Member No.: 7243 |
I've noticed this in different versions of Greensleeves.
Someone will be able to give a more technical answer, but with the G naturals it sounds more 'modal', probably like it was sung originally. I suspect that the G sharps are put in by some editors to make the tune more 'normal' to our modern ears. Get them to play it as written, an examiner can always look at the music afterwards if they are in doubt, and they'll be hearing Flute Grade 1 so often the G natural version will be familiar to them! |
| sjc |
Oct 11 2007, 08:44 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 454 Joined: 21-May 07 From: somewhere in england Member No.: 11470 |
have you checked with piano score?
|
| Garkleine |
Oct 11 2007, 08:45 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 580 Joined: 30-November 03 From: NorthWest England Member No.: 216 |
Thanks for the reply -thats more or less what I was thinking -thanks for the advice. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
|
| Cyrilla |
Oct 11 2007, 10:48 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Maestro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 11904 Joined: 9-November 03 From: Croydon, South London/Surrey Member No.: 99 |
Yes - without the G#s is an older version of the melody and is indeed modal. The whole tune is fascinating as the various versions chart its development. The version with B natural is older than the one with B flat - as I understand it, another excellent example of musica ficta.
I'm sure other more knowledgeable people will have more observations on this very interesting subject! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 06:52 AM |