A shortened version of the Forums Rules is given below. The full version can be found here.
By maintaining a user account and by posting to these forums, you hereby agree to abide by these rules.
FORUMS RULES - A SNAPSHOT
- Stay safe - protect your privacy and respect the privacy of others
- No abusive, offensive or aggressive postings
- No insults or personal attacks
- No foul language
- No trolling
- No inappropriate or illegal material
- No advertising (including "For Sale" or "Wanted" adverts)
- No crossposting
- No forum spamming
- No defamatory comments
- Avoid using jargon, abbreviations or "text talk"
![]() ![]() |
| SueHM |
Jun 18 2007, 08:18 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Unregistered |
I'm getting really confused about how to describe augmented 6th chords (German etc) with Extended Roman notation.
Do you use the bass note of the chord as written to 'name' the chord? Do you need to specify the chromatically altered notes in the notation or is it sufficient to call it German or whatever and these things are assumed? Quite difficult to explain without fancy fonts that do sharps and flats etc... Does anyone know of a good book/website? I've tried the AB pink and blue books and Harmony in Practice but they haven't really answered the question for me. Any help gratefully received! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ill.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ill.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ill.gif) |
| sbhoa |
Jun 18 2007, 08:46 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Maestro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 18925 Joined: 31-October 03 From: Tameside Member No.: 24 |
I don't think I ever described them that way.
On a theory paper I'd just use words. |
| Kai-Lei |
Jun 19 2007, 10:09 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 174 Joined: 27-September 05 Member No.: 4809 |
It is made difficult because of so many views on how these chords are derived. I learned them as the second inversion of the incomplete supertonic chromatic with the bass flatteded a semitone. I no longer think of them like that! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)
If forced I'd probably use figured notation or just put G6 I6 or F6 hoping that if someone was able to analyse that kind of harmony they would spot what was happening. In composing people just use them when they want that sound in a cadence. Kai |
| SueHM |
Jun 19 2007, 11:02 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Unregistered |
Thanks both, glad I'm not the only one who finds these tricky!
|
| BusyBee |
Jun 25 2007, 09:02 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Unregistered |
Hi Sue,
I was meandering through Eric Taylor's AB Guide Book Two while I was watching the Henman match on TV this evening and I think I found an answer to your question. Fairly straightforward I think: The notes Ab C Eb F# are described as a bVI in C (the little b is the best I can do as a flat sign on here) (Taylor, The AB Guide to Music Theory, p164) Later in the book there is an example in G minor with the same notes as above with the extended Roman label - bII6 (a little 6 though of course). (Taylor, Appendix D, xiii) Hope this helps (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) P.S I wonder if the AB moderators could provide the theory forum with a list of sharps, flats, naturals etc for us to click on to use. Like Sibelius? |
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 05:15 PM |