Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Forum Rules

A shortened version of the Forums Rules is given below. The full version can be found here.

By maintaining a user account and by posting to these forums, you hereby agree to abide by these rules.

FORUMS RULES - A SNAPSHOT
- Stay safe - protect your privacy and respect the privacy of others
- No abusive, offensive or aggressive postings
- No insults or personal attacks
- No foul language
- No trolling
- No inappropriate or illegal material
- No advertising (including "For Sale" or "Wanted" adverts)
- No crossposting
- No forum spamming
- No defamatory comments
- Avoid using jargon, abbreviations or "text talk"

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Augmented 6ths, Extended Roman notation
SueHM
post Jun 18 2007, 08:18 PM
Post #1


Unregistered









I'm getting really confused about how to describe augmented 6th chords (German etc) with Extended Roman notation.

Do you use the bass note of the chord as written to 'name' the chord?

Do you need to specify the chromatically altered notes in the notation or is it sufficient to call it German or whatever and these things are assumed?

Quite difficult to explain without fancy fonts that do sharps and flats etc...

Does anyone know of a good book/website? I've tried the AB pink and blue books and Harmony in Practice but they haven't really answered the question for me.

Any help gratefully received!

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/ill.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ill.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ill.gif)
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sbhoa
post Jun 18 2007, 08:46 PM
Post #2


Maestro
******

Group: Members
Posts: 18925
Joined: 31-October 03
From: Tameside
Member No.: 24



I don't think I ever described them that way.
On a theory paper I'd just use words.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kai-Lei
post Jun 19 2007, 10:09 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 174
Joined: 27-September 05
Member No.: 4809



It is made difficult because of so many views on how these chords are derived. I learned them as the second inversion of the incomplete supertonic chromatic with the bass flatteded a semitone. I no longer think of them like that! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

If forced I'd probably use figured notation or just put G6 I6 or F6 hoping that if someone was able to analyse that kind of harmony they would spot what was happening.

In composing people just use them when they want that sound in a cadence.

Kai
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SueHM
post Jun 19 2007, 11:02 AM
Post #4


Unregistered









Thanks both, glad I'm not the only one who finds these tricky!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
BusyBee
post Jun 25 2007, 09:02 PM
Post #5


Unregistered









Hi Sue,

I was meandering through Eric Taylor's AB Guide Book Two while I was watching the Henman match on TV this evening and I think I found an answer to your question.

Fairly straightforward I think:

The notes Ab C Eb F# are described as a bVI in C (the little b is the best I can do as a flat sign on here)
(Taylor, The AB Guide to Music Theory, p164)

Later in the book there is an example in G minor with the same notes as above with the extended Roman label - bII6 (a little 6 though of course). (Taylor, Appendix D, xiii)


Hope this helps (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

P.S I wonder if the AB moderators could provide the theory forum with a list of sharps, flats, naturals etc for us to click on to use. Like Sibelius?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
« Next Oldest · Theory and Composition · Next Newest »
 

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 05:15 PM