I was just thinking about the greater note spacing of the double bass, and the greater weight presumably required to draw a sound from the strings when bowed. For those reasons I would anticipate a given piece of music would simply be harder to play on the double bass than the cello. I wondered what compensations are given to the bass player in terms of making their scores less full of notes than the equivalent scores for their cello playing colleagues. I was interested to note when having a quick look at some orchestral scores on bravobis, that at least in the scores I looked at there is one line marked "cellos and basses", and the basses have to play exactly the same notes as the cellos (albeit an octave lower), including the same fast runs and the same spread of notes.
Is there any compensating feature, or is being an orchestral double bass player just incredibly difficult?
On a different question, how significant is the difference between 3/4 and full size double basses? If equated to the diffence between a 3/4 or full size violin, the difference would be colossal, yet I have read in a few places that so many people play a 3/4 bass that it is almost viewed as the norm. Is that the case in professional orchestras? How much difference is there in the sound?
I am beginning to wonder if the rich deep sound I have always associated with an orchestra's cello section is in fact a combined sound of cellos and double basses, and that cellos alone are very often sounding more in the mid range of notes.
Why the sudden interest? Pipe dreaming about a 3/4 Gliga Gems I double bass reduced to little more than £1000 on the violinslover site!
