QUOTE(Stephen Barber @ Oct 2 2009, 02:41 PM)

QUOTE(Mad Tom @ Sep 28 2009, 11:48 AM)

QUOTE(Stephen Barber @ Sep 3 2009, 11:13 AM)

Anyone who thinks they have heard Pachelbel's Canon on the organ is mistaken - it's not possible.
I don't believe you. It must be possible to play something approximating it, if only the bass line, chord sequence, and some sort of melody.
It is, of course, possible to do just that. I have often had to do it (albeit reluctantly). BUT IT'S NOT WHAT PACHELBEL wrote. It's not even in the spirit of what he wrote - which is a piece in strict counterpoint. Playing something that "approximates" to his piece is just "dumbed down" music-substitute for the masses.
Absolutely: the bass line, chord sequence and "some sort of melody" are pretty boring by themselves - if you don't listen to the way the three melodic lines imitate and interweave, you're going to miss the point of the piece. I find that recent (professional) versions of this piece tend to take it so fast that the melody and shape is lost in a flurry of notes, which again, rather defeats Pachelbel's purpose. I love some of the older versions of the Canon. I think it's a beautiful piece and can listen to it over and over. If it comes on Classic fm though, I just switch off because it's always too fast.