QUOTE(pianodub @ Oct 15 2006, 03:43 PM)

A friend of mine gets really irrate about kids coming in an coughing all over him when he is teaching. He eventually told one Dad that it would be better if the child didn't come when he is ill, as it makes the teacher sick which makes him miss work etc etc etc. However I don't think he suggested repaying the lesson, which is a little messy I think!
I think sometimes the problem is some teachers seem to say "don't come if you're ill" but also "you have to pay for lessons you miss". So, while I can understand very much teachers not wanting to be exposed to lots of bugs, and still wanting their income, if a child has a term where they catch lots of colds, the parent's in the unenviable position of having to pay for lessons the child has genuinely been ill for, but would have been well enough to have the lesson if the teacher hadn't been worried about catching bugs.
I had a horrible immune system as a child, (not great now

) and if my private lessons (which were few) had been on this basis, we'd've been out of pocket for a lot of lessons I wouldn't have been allowed to take, which would catch the parent coming or going, wouldn't it?
Maybe I've misunderstood what people have said, but I think I've seen people mention expecting to be paid for lessons missed and not being willing to give a lesson to a sick child. I can understand both those things, but I can also see how it could seem a bit of a catch 22 for parents whose children catch every cold going as I always did...