Inspired by another thread on this subject, I'd like to ask a question. Is it better for longterm playing to have just one teacher throughout childhood? Does changing teachers make a difference?
I had just one teacher from age 6-17, right the way through. I've always played the violin and it is my life, really.
A fantastic violinist friend up the road has a daughter who started violin at about 6. Her parents have changed her teacher twice, not because there was anything wrong with either teacher (quite the contrary in fact) but because they felt different teachers suited her needs better at different times. She now studies with a Professor of violin and she's still only about 12. Naturally, she plays amazingly.
I asked the dad at the time whether the daughter was upset at being made to change teachers and he said no, they explained the reasons and she was fine with it both times.
So, does constancy of teacher work better for longevity of playing, or does it have no real bearing? Perhaps the main thing is that the teacher is good, whether they were one or many, and that if there were enforced changes, the pupil understands the reasons why.
There's probably a tipping point where having too many changes of teacher just causes too much confusion, although having said that I played with another violinist recently who had had 12 teachers!!! His playing did show evidence of having been a bit 'pieced together' though. Another friend also had an unbelievable amount of teachers and his playing also had that quality of having had various bits removed and other bits stuck on, so to speak. Having said that, they're both very keen (adult) players.
I'm all confused now!
Violinia
