QUOTE(petrat @ Sep 2 2007, 11:30 PM)

Sorry, but am I the only one here who thinks that teachers should be fully conversant with their scales, theory and aural work before teaching others? If I were asking about lessons and was told that my teacher had only passed grade 3 I would be worried, despite any assurances that he or she was actually able to play pieces of grade 8 standard.
Scales and technical work: yes! I deliberately bail out of teaching the piano where I cannot play the scales or repertoire, repertoire is due to small hand size, scales, well partially its laziness, I can play all the major and minor scales in similar motion an octave apart but break down with thirds and sixths, oboe wise I know my scales, singing wise well I definately know my stuff.
Theory: There are a lot out there that don't and that's a real pity. It is rather useful being able to realise figured basses on the fly, and analyse the harmonic structure of a piece at sight. I would also add basic music history to that, setting a piece in context makes it much more enjoyable for the pupil too.
Aural: Well I didn't realise I know as much until I started teaching, but yes I tend to agree with you there Petra too. (particularly as a singing teacher - at a higher level the ability to 'nit pick' is essential)
Do remember Petra that I haven't passed anything above Grade 6 Piano grade wise, but my exams at Huddersfield required me to have reached a higher standard than that by the end of the second year. There are "equivalent" exams too!
Good luck Katyjay with the diploma!