QUOTE(Mad Tom @ Dec 8 2007, 11:04 AM)

QUOTE(jojo @ Dec 8 2007, 11:39 AM)

I think MadTom was cracking a joke and attempting to 'sell' the piano to MonkeyFlute
Imagine being able to sustain and even swell a note after attacking it.
Ooooh! My turn to 'sell' my instrument!! :-)
What you want here is a pipe organ. You can sustain a note for as long as you can keep a finger or foot on it, or until someone cuts the power to the blower (their patience would probably give up long before you did). And you have one or more expression pedals, specifically so you can swell a note like that - it's even called the Swell pedal (if there's just one).
And, as a pianist, your exisiting keyboard facility and reading of two stave polyphony will give you a headstart.
QUOTE
And to be able to play perfectly in tune in any key, instead of always being slightly out. And you can carry one about with you. And then memorising the repertoire cannot be so difficult as piano - there is usually just a single musical line to master. And orchestras need dozens of violinists - but only occasionally a guest pianist.
Ah. This is where it comes a bit unstuck. Tuning is more of a problem than on piano. And it's even less portable and fewer places have one available. And there's three staves of music to learn, plus all the organ management stuff (registration, manual changes, etc.) so memorisation is unusual even for recitalists. And orchestras need an organist even less often than they need a pianist.
*gives up on attempt to hawk the organ*
QUOTE
If I could go back 40 years I might choose violin instead of the piano.
But every time I am tempted to learn a second instrument (I have dabbled with guitar and clarinet) I just think how I could spend those extra hours on the piano. I'd rather be pretty good on one instrument than mediocre on two or three or more.
*spots a possible selling point* ;-)
Organ is sufficiently similar to piano that time spent practicing it might even benefit your piano playing.
I "worked" for a piano exam by hardly touching the piano but doing the organ exam 2 grades lower, then working for the one directly below it, and passed the piano one having done hardly any piano practice.
I get where you're coming from though, because that's how I usually think about the piano - time spent working on it could be spent on organ or on another instrument (I'm an incurable dabbler, so I've had to opt for mediocre on several rather than good on one, but piano isn't one of the chosen ones).
Anyway, when starting an instrument as an adult, the goal is generally to have fun with it and get reasonably good. Getting right to the top isn't normally part of the plan. So, playing more than one instrument 'for fun', rather than trying to get to FRSM in a single instrument is quite typical among adult learners. No reason why MonkeyFlute can't have fun with flute and violin and get pretty good at both, especially as they're instruments that aren't going to interfere with each other at all (two woodwinds might cause confusion between fingerings, a treble clef and a bass clef instrument might lead to occasion mix-ups in note reading, small bore brass with single reed woodwind might cause embouchure problems, etc., but I really can't think of /anything/ like that for the flute-violin combination).
T.