QUOTE(Mad Tom @ Dec 23 2007, 01:41 AM)

QUOTE(Oldpiano @ Dec 22 2007, 11:07 AM)

23 preludes is a pretty good effort! I'd love to be able to do that.
No.16 does look pretty tough. What about no.24? I gave it a try, and it is way over my head!!!
Yes No. 24 has its tricky passages (the runs in 3rds amongst them). And No 19 took a lot of work. But No. 16 is in a different league of difficulty. It is unremitting freneticism from start to finish.
Have you noticed that all composers seem to do this. They make a set of pieces in which a few are easy, most are playable with work, and two or three you really have to slog at. But then they throw in one that is only playable by world class virtuosi. You don't mind when half the Opus is for superstars only, but when it is just ONE piece ...
Debussy did the same with the first set of Preludes. They are all approachable - except for "Ce qu'a vu le vent d'Ouest"
Maybe the world class virtuosi started off not being able to do no.16

I'll keep telling myself that. I've only been learning 5 months, and I get frustrated when I find anything I can't play. However, I've just listening to the Debussy prelude, and it is rediculous. It strikes me as something that might never be playable

I've never seen anything quite as phenomenal as this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAb2nI2hVqk