How wrong can you be!
A couple of months ago I was looking (on YouTube) at Michelangeli's and Horowitz 's versions of the first Chopin Ballade, and noticed that there were also videos of both of them playing Scarlatti sonatas.
Out of curiosity I watched Michelangeli playing L449 (Mistakenly listed as K449). Fantastic! Sublime! I decided right away that I had to learn it. (It turns out to be surprisingly difficult. The type of co-ordination and musical memory that it needs are subtly different from anything in the Bach, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, and Debussy that make up most of my repertoire, or indeed of the dozen other composers that make up tiny bits of it)
The Horowitz videos were also impressive, less so initially than Michelangeli's, but Horowitz's interpretations grow on you. A bit more research turned up more virtuoso performances from Argerich (L141 - another "must learn"), and Pogorelich (amongst others, L23 - the source of a tune that most of us have heard somewhere).
I went looking for CDs but all I could find were collections played on the harpsichord and I much preferred them on piano. (I know - I could have gone to Amazon and found some straight away - sometimes my brain does not engage fully. Besides it is fun to browse in a real music shop)
Anyway, a fortnight ago a CD appeared in Utrecht's main classical music store, containing Horowitz's personal selection, for piano, of the 18 finest Scarlatti's Sonatas (from over 550 written). Of course the man had control, speed, and precision to die for, but that doesn't help if you don't have the material to work with.
Immediately a handful of the selection stunned me (L.118 and L.481, both in F minor) but I could not understand how some of the others had made it into the top 18. That became clear after three or four listenings. They are all rich and deep masterpieces.
Checking out the ABRSM syllabus, there is a handful of Scarlatti sonatas in the grade exams, none listed for DipABRSM, but - good news
This all set me thinking: Which other worthwhile composers do I know nothing about? If I could overlook a major star like Scarlatti for so long then who else am I missing out on?
The "major" composers are pretty much decided for us by the larger society, but the "big names", even though their number runs into dozens or hundreds, are only a tiny percentage of all the composers that have produced works of music over the last 4 or 5 centuries. There were, for example, many dozens of musicians in J S Bach's time, living lives similar to Bach's, tenured to a church position, or to an aristoctratic patron, composing, teaching, and playing, each of them producing a large body of work.
It is difficult to find out about many of them because there are not many recordings out there, printed scores are largely unavailable, no-one has bothered to write up theit life stories for the Internet, and many of them merit only a few lines in Musical Dictionaries and Histories.
But there may easily be "lost" masters of the calibre of Bach and Scarlatti (and Pachelbel, Purcell, Couperin, Handel, Rameau, Daquin, ...) amongst them!
Then of course there is the music of a few generations before Bach to re-discover. It has been decided for us that Palestrina, Monteverdi, Byrde, and Gibbons are worth remembering - there are CDs and printed editions of their work - but again there were many, many more musicians active alongside them.
It looks like I have been very unadventurous - as Robodoc said when he heard my selection for the DipABRSM (Bach, Beethoven, Chopin, Rachmaninoff) - "not exactly pushing the boat out is it".
So what else have I been missing with my ultra-conservative outlook?
