QUOTE(Jon S @ Mar 14 2008, 01:04 PM)

QUOTE(kenm @ Mar 14 2008, 11:08 AM)

Acousticians have known the reason for this effect, and the relative weakness of the throat notes, for about 50 years now.
Pity they've not been able to do anything about it then!
Without going into all of the technicalities, the important acoustical difference between the throat notes and the lower ones is that the holes covered by the fingers create small Helmholtz resonators along the main tube, and these reduce the height and increase the width of the peaks in the plot of gain against frequency of the resonances to which the reed vibrations are locked. The throat notes have tall, narrow peaks. This suggests that the throat could be made similar to the main tube by drilling holes similar to the finger holes and covering them on the outside (easier than trying to drill blind holes from the inside of the tube. I seem to recall that the acousticians who wrote the paper suggested this, but I haven't reread the paper (in the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America) for several decades. I don't know of anyone trying this on an actual instrument, so it remains a theoretical prediction, AFAIK.* It would only involve the barrel, so if it didn't work you could buy another one.
* But the theory predicts also the tendency of the clarinet to go flat with increased amplitude, which I am told is the case.