QUOTE(The1DB @ May 16 2008, 03:40 PM)

The issue is I can't really get to come up with ideas
Is this music going to be tonal? If so, one approach would be to start by coming up with (provisional) harmony, if harmony wasn't already in your mind when you created the trumpet parts. That would steer you strongly towards a bass part, though you should be careful not to focus on simply making the inner parts fill out the chords, leading to dull parts.
Whether or not the music's tonal, it might be good to have the other parts play phrases that clearly derive from the existing trumpet parts. These could be just exact copies slid up or down diatonically, or in a related key if there are modulations (if the music's tonal) or the rhythm of the phrase used on different notes - eg, in similar motion to the original phrase, or inverted, on a completely different arrangement of pitches, or even on a single pitch.
Another possibility is: if there are any striking, short patterns - eg three of four notes with memorable rhythm and/or pitches lasting a second or two, either in the existing trumpet parts or that you write in another part - you could pick a couple and put them in significant places in the other parts.
The best outcome, in some respects, would be if all the parts appeared to act independently and were interesting in themseleves, whilst also being clearly related to the other parts and delivering your chosen harmony (or whatever) effortlessly, and with a few invigorating surprises during music that's otherwise progressing somewhat as the listener would expect. But if you could do that, we'd probably all have heard of you already.
I think, initially, you ought to continue in an exploratory phase, like you did in coming up with the trumpet parts. There's nothing wrong with a "what if ..." approach, where you just put some notes in the score (eg a phrase copied from another part) and see what it sounds like - even if it sounds awful, it might give you an idea of how to do something similar but better, or even spark a completely different idea. It doesn't matter if you enter the notes in a mechanical way, unable to hear how the instruments will sound together until you've (eg) heard the music played on the piano or by a computer program. In short, en route to the finished piece, it doesn't matter what you do to come up with ideas and how many bad ones you discard. But, once the piece starts taking shape, you may well find that you mentally hear passages that you simply want to write into the score.
It would be very surprising if you could do all this in your head and then write it down. It would also need a high level of skill to mentally hear all the parts you've written in a score, without any playing out loud of any kind - though perhaps you can do that?
I suggest that, since you have access to Sibelius, you should do some exploratory work either in Sibelius or in any other program that lets you get instant playback of what you're trying out (eg at school, my daughter has Garage Band; at home, I have Cubase). These programs also give you a rough idea of how the instruments will combine, though they might let you get the balance wrong - eg by turning down the trumpets' volume to let the clarinet be heard.
I hope that helps.