QUOTE(dcmbarton @ Jun 3 2008, 11:30 PM)

The answer is yes. If a composer's work is included and they died after 1938, then a royalty payment would be made to them if they are still alive, or their estate. This is why I am so against photocopying, because everytime a piece is photocopied, then the composer loses out. Sometimes, even if the composer died before 1938 the work may have been edited by someone still alive or who died after 1938 and therefore a royalty payment would be paid in respect of that.
That said, no one get's very much. Roughly 10% of the sale of the book would be divided between the composers contained in it. Obviously, if the book has been sold at trade price, then there's even less to divide. For example, two of my books of pieces retail for £8.00, and I get 10%; that's 80p per copy sold. If I consider the same say for a choral piece which retails at about £1.60, then I get 16p per copy sold. You can begin to see how many copies one needs to sell in order to actually make money as a composer (that is, if anyone buys your music at all...!)
David
Then, of course, if someone buys a copy, no longer uses it, so gives it away (no royalty there), or donates it to a charity shop which sells it (no royalty there) or sells it on e-bay (no royalty there), you composers are losing out all round. Likewise with the sale of second hand CDs, videos, DVDs, etc.
I'm not advocationg photocopying, just wondering what can be done to protect your rights over the other examples. I confess to buying quite a bit of second hand music from e-bay. It's quite big business.