QUOTE(Deborah @ Jul 7 2008, 10:56 AM)

Oh, and be prepared for the killer question at the end, "Is there anything else you'd like to say?".
Hmm, this is worrying me! That is such a vague and broad question! What sort of thing would you talk about?
I'm trying to put together some sort of revision strategy at the moment and I was thinking of covering these elements for each composer and piece I'm doing:
First of all, my programme: why I chose these piece, why I chose to perform them in this order.
Then think about each piece:
Composer's background, compositional output, relevance/importance in the history/development of music, contemporary composers/other composers who composed similar works - how they're similar/different, characteristics of this composer's works. If the piece is dedicated to someone - who they are, the relevance of this.
Then form/structure, key/tonality, harmony, title - what it means, its relevance...Italian/French/whatever language terms used in the composition and their meanings (just in case).
Then, the piano - how it developed and what the instrument was like for different the composers that occur in my programme and maybe what contributions these composers made to the development of the instrument, technical aspects of each work.
If I do this, I should be ok, surely?!
The extensiveness of the viva voce has dawned on me today!