Son has been listening to various violinists, and has picked German Christian Tetzlaff as his current "violin hero".
He says he likes the depth of tone. I'm not too sure just what he means by that, but never mind.
I've been curious to note really quite big differences in product reviews from US and Europe "consumers" - I'm beginning to think that when people say they want "fire" or "passion" in playing, they are talking about specific things such as a very hard attack in articulating beginnings of phrases, and using heavy bow pressure (choosing power rather than sweetness at times) rather often.
And then I see violinists who seem to me to have a beautiful clarity and evenness of tone reviled for lack of "fire". The dynamics are there, but it's not on/off switch high contrast stuff.
But what do I know?!
Is this high-contrast dynamics "shredding" the current trend? Or is it just that one or two high-profile people play that way (or even just that audiences think it would be good if they did!)?
Or are there really clear differences in taste on both sides of the Atlantic than the other? Would anybody like to stick their neck out and say that they think that this violinist is at the top of the "fiery passion" game, and that violinist is at the top of the "elegance" game?
