QUOTE(and36y @ Mar 18 2009, 07:55 AM)

Has anyone any experience of a Knight k10 piano, what are they like to live with any bad points I have seen on in my local piano shop, on inspection it looks top quality, and sounds fantasic, though they are asking alot for it. I have a samick su112 that I bought new 15 years ago, and it sounds positively dull compared to the knight.
I am trying to justify the change to myself, and would I be upgrading by getting a piano twice the age of my current one. Or should I look at at Yamaha u3 as a replacement (second hand of course)
ndy
If you can find a second-hand Knight from the 1960s/70s which has been well looked-after and well maintained/regularly tuned, it will almost certainly still be a top quality instrument.
My own Knight is the only piano I bought new and after 40+ years of playing and teaching on it, it is still a piano I will not sell. Both my son and daughter prefer it to my Broadwood Grand, and I myself prefer its treble tone to that of the Grand.
Knights had the reputation of being the finest British piano and were much sought after in the 1960s/70s. When I bought mine there was a three months' waiting list. However, after Alfred Knight discontinued business, the firm was taken over and I think it has changed hands once or twice. The sound quality of Knight pianos has changed and modern Knights are not, in my opinion, of the same high quality as my own.
If you wish to buy a modern piano (one built in the last 10/20 years) at a competitive price perhaps you should go for a Yamaha.