QUOTE(HelenVJ @ Apr 3 2009, 10:51 AM)

The girl in question came over y'day for her first post-exam lesson, so I thought I'd run the Einaudi past her. It hadn't been something she'd requested - she claimed never to have heard of him - but as soon as I embarked on 'Le Onde' her eyes lit up: 'Oh, I want to play that!' - which is what it's all about really, isn't it. I played a few others to her too - we agreed they all sounded pretty repetitive - but I sent her off with the volume, and know she'll get going on it.
'How the world has changed in 40 years! Are those days gone forever when every young girl wanted to play Sinding's Rustle of Spring, Mendelsohn's first Song Without Words, and the four-hands Arrival of the Queen of Sheba?
Good teaching is all about understanding your students and doing what is best for them. I would not dream of trying to tell you what you should and should not encourage (or allow) them to play. Whatever works! I learned to read on the Dandy, Beano, Beezer and Topper - followed by some books that I would be to embarrassed to name here. When I look at them now I fail to see any interest in them whatsoever. When I was 13 Shakespeare was a bore. Now he is quite wonderful.
If Einaudi encourages someone to get their fingers going - great - use it.
I actually believe that amongst the works of for example Haydn and Mozart there are plenty of pieces that should enthuse any teenage girl that enjoys 'Le Onde'. The adagios in Mozart's sonatas and sets of variations are without exception heart-rendingly beautiful. Then there are such pieces as the second movement of Haydn's sonata in F (Hob XVI/23). Not at all difficult to play. A simple yet beautiful melody, "Einaudi-esque" arpeggiated accompaniment. Straightforward harmonic progressions. But with a wealth of musical wit and subtlety behind the superficially simple exterior.
QUOTE(HelenVJ @ Apr 3 2009, 10:51 AM)

With respect, Tom, I can't imagine any Haydn or Bach that would have had the same effect, though we'll get started on some Mendelssohn and poss Grieg after the holiday ( and Grade 5 theory!) . She's not quite up to Chopin Nocturnes yet; but given time..
Maybe there is a faint echo of Chopin's Nocturnes in Einaudi?
I have already confessed my real reasons for not thinking much of Einaudi's music. There does not seem to be much to it - and I can produce similar stuff. Conversely I doubt that I shall ever have the musical understanding to create music that bears comparison with that of the 5 composers you have mentioned above. I am in awe of what they (and others) can create in sound.
In Einaudi's shoes - looking dispassionately at the compositions, I would never have thought them fit for publication nor dreamt of inflicting them on the rest of the world. I think it is basically a fraud. Charlatanism masquerading as art. A la Tracy Emin, or any number of recent Turner prizes. EInaudi also has the advantage that he looks every inch the tortured, sensitive artist. Basically I am jealous!!!
But who knows? Perhaps he is privately a supremely capable musician who could, if he wanted, write a piano sonata to rival Prokofiev's. But that he chooses not to because he knows just what appeals to his target audience. And is he doing something right? Perhaps there is something of value in his music that explains his success and popularity. I just cannot see what it is!