QUOTE(lottie @ Mar 31 2009, 08:58 AM)

There are two reasons I did this. Firstly my violin was hand-made by a relative novice who hasn't got the knack of varnishing yet. The varnish on Martha hadn't been allowed to dry properly between coats and was rather soft. All the advice I was given was to let her 'air dry' as much as possible. I don't know if it's really helped because the chin-rest, shoulder-rest and bridge have all 'bent' the varnish down to the wood although the damage seems to have stopped getting worse now(she was like that when I bought her). I've been advised the only cure is a complete re-varnish by an expert but that's really not feasible

.
A degree of softness/delicacy in a varnish is generally regarded as a good thing. If, for example, you ever get the chance to see the Messiah Strad at the Ashmolean in Oxford, you'll see that despite the fact that it's hardly been played since it was made, there are areas where the delicate varnish has chipped off. This shows how soft/delicate the legendary Stradivari varnish is, and also explains why many of the old Cremonese violins have hardly any original varnish remaining (making the attractive "wear pattern" that modern makers often spend ages trying to emulate), despite having been treasured as extremely valuable objects for all their existence. Strad varnish is also reputed to be so soft as to be able to take a fingerprint impression after a fairly short period of contact.
When formulated/applied properly, this kind of varnish has a kind of "alive" quality and will shrink, develop texture and change colour over the years in a beautiful, subtle way that the "bulletproof" varnish applied to factory instruments will never achieve.
It may well be that the person who made your fiddle didn't know what they were doing in the varnish department, but soft varnish, done properly, is not an intrinsically bad thing (even violins by the very best professional makers will often show some varnish damage in the regions you describe).