QUOTE(missypiano @ Apr 20 2009, 01:32 PM)

QUOTE(Cadence @ Apr 16 2009, 12:01 PM)

One thing - if you find it difficult to do, it is probably (not definitely as I obviously haven't seen you play!) down to finger strength, which you can overcome quite effectively in a relatively short period of time using the Leitschky (sp?) Method.
Apologies - slightly off topic...Hope you don't mind me asking Cadence but what is the Leitschky method? I normally play scales very loudly to build finger strength but would be really interested to hear of another method if there is a more effective one!!!!
QUOTE(HelenVJ @ Apr 20 2009, 03:08 PM)

Cadence was, no doubt, referring to the Leschetizky method. Not easy to summarise, and I no longer advocate many of the principles myself. Too much emphasis on pure finger strength can all too easily lead to some form of strain, often with devastating consequences. Peter Feuchtwanger's ideas, based on ease of movement and relaxation, are much more in sympathy with my own.
Yes, it is the Leschetizky method I was referring to (sorry - bad with spelling!).
I actually had never heard of this method until this year, but had unknowingly been applying it to my own playing since a young age. Whilst I agree with Helen that over emphasis and total focus on finger strength is not to be advocated due to the strain that can be caused, I believe that with advanced players and with adults (both categories of people who I believe would be sensible and follow my advice to avoid any problems!) aspects of the method can be extract and used for one's own purposes.
Peter Feuchtwanger is someone who I have heard about, as I currently am following the piano-yoga course to increase my hand span (I have very small hands and stumbled across the website of the lady who devised this method whilst I was looking for piano teachers) and I read somewhere that his ideas are related to this concept, in that they both seem to use the principles of movement, relaxation and the relationship between the mind and the body. I haven't yet completed the course, so I can't say whether my fingers will actually get stronger, but I have certainly dramatically increased my reach on the piano already.
Another aspect of the Leschetizky method that I don't think can be achieved as effectively elsewhere, or so quickly (with commitment!) is finger independance, which I value very highly.
I do still think though, that finger strength is important, because without it, we wouldn't have as much control. I always explain it to my students like this: Think about the difference between a very strong/fit person doing sit-ups and a weak/unfit person doing sit-ups. The person with strong stomach muscles could do a sit-up and then lower their upper body down as slow as they liked, controlling their movement with their muscles. The person with weak stomach muscles might be able to do a sit-up, but on the coming down, they would be hard pressed to control their descent and their upper body would probably just drop down fast as they had no control over the movement of their muscles. Its the same with the fingers - strong fingers = more control over the sound, meaning that you can consciously choose the tone and sound that you want to create.
Out of interest Helen, is it simply the over-emphasis of finger strength that means you don't agree with the principles in the Leschetizky method or are there other reasons you don't like it?