QUOTE(Mad Tom @ Jul 13 2009, 12:15 PM)

It is so easy to give the wrong impression when communication is by just the written word.
That is something on which I agree with you 100%

.
QUOTE(Mad Tom @ Jul 13 2009, 12:15 PM)

I have tried very carefully to refrain from telling anyone what they should or should not do. I am just pointing out that we have limited time and it is a matter of personal values and difficult choices what you choose to do with it. I am sorry if that is the impresion that you formed, despite my efforts to avoid it.
OK, you haven't actually said "do this" or "do that" but the conclusions that I draw from your previous posts (which to my impression at least are more forceful than this one) are that
if we want to place a high value on musical achievement
then we must do certain things as a consequence. (You already posted that it is an IF.....THEN argument). It is easy for me to interpret this as strong advice, but I agree it is falling short of being a command.
QUOTE(Mad Tom @ Jul 13 2009, 12:15 PM)

If you made a habit of giving up your entire weekend to help others then it definitely would mean that on your personal scale of values being a helpful person was more important thah achieving your musical targets. As an occasional change in routine it means nothing of the kind.
I am sorry, I didn't realise you placed a different meaning on short term changes to values, from long term changes to those same values. But surely we are all subjected, to varying degrees, to short term demands on our times caused by changes to our routines due to reasons beyond our control? A lot of such demands may result in quite a loss of practice time over the year, but I am unhappy at the thought that as a result of your advice I would think I was guilty of not putting a high enough value in general on my musical targets. I have started a new instrument at the age when a lot of people are thinking of doing less. I am well aware that the length of time I have for working at it may well be limited by things beyond my control. I have given it a very high priority in my life, but I frequently acknowledge that other things may take an even higher priority. Sometimes I think I am a selfish person for spending so much time with my flute, but your previous posts have saddened me by setting me thinking that I am a weak person for not devoting more of what remains of my life to it, in order to achieve the target I have set myself of learning to play the flute well enough to join a reasonably good amateur orchestra, and to play solo pieces well enough for people to enjoy. I know you will say it is my choice, but whether you intended to or not with your previous posts, you have sown the seeds of doubt in my own mind.
QUOTE(Mad Tom @ Jul 13 2009, 12:15 PM)

1. But I don't say what you or anyone else should (or should not) do. I certainly do not suggest that we should all selfishly pursue our own goals without consideration for others. I just point out the logic of the situation and the choices that are available. They are not easy choices. I suspect that for most people the end-result of looking hard at their life and their priorities would be that music has to occupy a modest place, and so they will have to accept that they will never be as accomplished as they could be if they developed their gifts to the full.
2. It is not simplistic, but a simple fact that if a person is never able to find enough time to study or practice, and wants to free up more time, then they will have to find that time from somewhere. Something, somewhere has to give. Doing less for other people is just one of many possible ways of freeing up some time.
I can't fault your logic when you put it like this.
QUOTE(Mad Tom @ Jul 13 2009, 12:15 PM)

YOu are right there
Well Tom, at least I got something right