Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Cancelling Double Sharps For Normal Sharps?
Forums > ABRSM > Theory and Composition
wurlitzer
In a bar of music which I am writing in C Sharp Minor, I have three F's.
The first F in the bar is an F Sharp so it obviously doesn't need a sharp sign next to it, but the second if is a F double sharp, so I've put a double sharp sign infront of it. But my problem is, the third F in the bar is a normal F sharp so when I'm marking it as a normal F sharp do I need to put a flat sign to cancel the double sharp AND a sharp sign to resharpen it or just a sharp sign?
I hope this makes sense! smile.gif
Thank you!
hello_cello
QUOTE(wurlitzer @ Sep 26 2009, 10:05 PM) *

In a bar of music which I am writing in C Sharp Minor, I have three F's.
The first F in the bar is an F Sharp so it obviously doesn't need a sharp sign next to it, but the second if is a F double sharp, so I've put a double sharp sign infront of it. But my problem is, the third F in the bar is a normal F sharp so when I'm marking it as a normal F sharp do I need to put a flat sign to cancel the double sharp AND a sharp sign to resharpen it or just a sharp sign?
I hope this makes sense! smile.gif
Thank you!


I'd put a flat infront of it, but in brackets put a #.
Car Expert
In this situation, the second note should have both a natural and a sharp/flat sign (in that order) written before it I would've thought.

Car Expert
SueHM
I think a natural followed by a sharp is a somewhat old fashioned way (although to my mind clearer) of saying that you want the note to be a sharp, rather than a double sharp. However the more modern way of doing it is simply to put a sharp in front of the note in question.
skylark
Is the 3rd F at the same octave as the 2nd F? An accidental only applies to notes on the same line or space, so if the 3rd F is at a different octave to the 2nd F, you wouldn't put an accidental against the 3rd F at all.
PianoDoodler
Accidentals trump key signatures as they come later in the piece, so the third F merely needs a sharp sign to return to being F#. This also cancels out any previous accidentals at the same pitch.

biggrin.gif
Frederic Chopin
The third F should have one sharp in front of it! smile.gif
HenryJ
Just want to add my thoughts to this: Would it not be easier to read if the F double sharp was written as a G natural?
hello_cello
QUOTE(HenryJ @ Sep 27 2009, 10:26 AM) *

Just want to add my thoughts to this: Would it not be easier to read if the F double sharp was written as a G natural?

Yes, but it would be wrong in the key signature of C# Minor.
Car Expert
QUOTE(SueHM @ Sep 26 2009, 10:56 PM) *
I think a natural followed by a sharp is a somewhat old fashioned way (although to my mind clearer) of saying that you want the note to be a sharp, rather than a double sharp. However the more modern way of doing it is simply to put a sharp in front of the note in question.
The piece I looked at for reference (from a fairly modern book) uses two accidentals, although it certainly looks rather cramped with two rather than with just the one accidental laugh.gif

Car Expert
river
QUOTE(HenryJ @ Sep 27 2009, 10:26 AM) *

Just want to add my thoughts to this: Would it not be easier to read if the F double sharp was written as a G natural?


FIPB Image and G are not the same note, except on a tempered instrument like a piano or guitar.
HenryJ
QUOTE(river @ Sep 27 2009, 12:49 PM) *

QUOTE(HenryJ @ Sep 27 2009, 10:26 AM) *

Just want to add my thoughts to this: Would it not be easier to read if the F double sharp was written as a G natural?


FIPB Image and G are not the same note, except on a tempered instrument like a piano or guitar.

Yes, I know that this is so. Do we know what instrument the composer is writing for? If so then I missed that.

QUOTE(hello_cello @ Sep 27 2009, 11:25 AM) *

QUOTE(HenryJ @ Sep 27 2009, 10:26 AM) *

Just want to add my thoughts to this: Would it not be easier to read if the F double sharp was written as a G natural?

Yes, but it would be wrong in the key signature of C# Minor.



And why is this Hello-Cello? F double sharp is not in that key either.
AndyL
QUOTE(SueHM @ Sep 26 2009, 10:56 PM) *

I think a natural followed by a sharp is a somewhat old fashioned way (although to my mind clearer) of saying that you want the note to be a sharp, rather than a double sharp. However the more modern way of doing it is simply to put a sharp in front of the note in question.


I agree with this. Natural followed by sharp is the older way to do it, just a sharp on its own is more modern (although some may still use the first method). Both are pretty unambiguous, I think, so it doesn't matter that much which you use, I'd go for the modern method - less cluttered.

QUOTE(river @ Sep 27 2009, 12:49 PM) *

FIPB Image and G are not the same note, except on a tempered instrument like a piano or guitar.


Right, but even on piano and guitar, there is still a theoretical difference. In piano music it does usually matter whether something is written as F# or Gb.
wurlitzer
QUOTE(HenryJ @ Sep 27 2009, 10:26 AM) *

Just want to add my thoughts to this: Would it not be easier to read if the F double sharp was written as a G natural?


No. smile.gif
Because there are a few G's sharps in the bar also.

Also, the piece is being written for solo piano.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.