Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Graded Pieces On You Tube
Forums > ABRSM > Teachers
lorraineliyanage
I just found some good performances of Grade 8 pieces on You tube by a piano teacher. I am sure other grades are available but I haven't looked through all his videos.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6veOqXSeT4...feature=related
Solari
QUOTE(lorraineliyanage @ Oct 17 2009, 07:07 PM) *

I just found some good performances of Grade 8 pieces on You tube by a piano teacher. I am sure other grades are available but I haven't looked through all his videos.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6veOqXSeT4...feature=related




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5hqrSKnG5s

Now that is awesome! (same guy!)
lorraineliyanage
Yeah that version of Fever is great, I'm going to give that a go this morning, I've been playing (and teaching) a much blander version!
jenny
QUOTE(lorraineliyanage @ Oct 17 2009, 07:07 PM) *

[font=Arial]I just found some good performances of Grade 8 pieces on You tube by a piano teacher. I am sure other grades are available but I haven't looked through all his videos.



I encourage all my pupils to have a look on Youtube for their exam pieces. I think it really helps to hear other people play them so that they get an idea of how they should sound. Having me demonstrate in their lessons once a week is sometimes not enough, especially when there are tricky rhythms involved. But I do warn them that young people playing them on Youtube may not always be giving an accurate performance - better to watch the teachers! smile.gif
jm-hamilton
I encourage mine to do this too. I usually look for a version I like then direct them to that version. I used some great ones for Grade 4 this summer.
JoMook
This guy has posted graded 1-5 (not the alternate pieces).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWoWl1ytxVY
jm-hamilton
QUOTE(JoMook @ Oct 18 2009, 03:14 PM) *

This guy has posted graded 1-5 (not the alternate pieces).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWoWl1ytxVY

That's the one I used. I thought they were well played. I always feel the CDs for ABRSM exams are too "professional" whereas this chap plays them in a way that made my pupils think that it was possible to get their performances something near to his.
Aquarelle
QUOTE
QUOTE(jm-hamilton @ Oct 18 2009, 02:22 PM) *


That's the one I used. I thought they were well played. I always feel the CDs for ABRSM exams are too "professional" whereas this chap plays them in a way that made my pupils think that it was possible to get their performances something near to his.


I agree. I find the AB recordings quite discouraging sometimes and often lacking in musical imagination.
jenny
QUOTE(Aquarelle @ Oct 18 2009, 03:54 PM) *

QUOTE
QUOTE(jm-hamilton @ Oct 18 2009, 02:22 PM) *


That's the one I used. I thought they were well played. I always feel the CDs for ABRSM exams are too "professional" whereas this chap plays them in a way that made my pupils think that it was possible to get their performances something near to his.


I agree. I find the AB recordings quite discouraging sometimes and often lacking in musical imagination.


So do I. Mine used to be so daunted by the AB recordings! sad.gif
RoseRodent
Yes, I am often convinced I hear the pianist using pedals in the early grade CDs and I don't think it's appropriate because the student hasn't got there yet, how can they produce a like performance?

There's an awful lot of pieces on YouTube which are actually the CD with a photo of some tiny child just to wind everyone up, though. Not sure how much it's worth AB's time and money following up the copyright issues cos first you have to prove it's the CD, then get YouTube to care, etc. all time and money.

Just paid an absolutely breathtaking amount for the viola CDs though, could have done without that expense, but it seemed cheaper than getting each of the books (some of them big volumes at £20) this way I get to choose my pieces from the CD then get the books. (To prepare the current grade 6 pieces for the Dip teaching)
lorraineliyanage
The AB CDs are always played at breakneck speed too which puts off all my pupils when they are learning new pieces. I usually play them the pieces at a slower speed then once they are making good progress with it, play them a faster version approaching the suggested speed.
pianosingkimbo

Watch out on You Tube, there was once a video of a girl playing a grade 1 c list piece from a year or so ago, 'The Old Cuckoo Clock' if anyone remembers it, and she was playing with absolutley no staccato as fast as she could possibly play, and it sounded pretty rubbish. Could be more of a hindrance than a help if a pupil stumbles across it and thinks its the way it should be played.
RoseRodent
Has anyone seen this one? [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP2vKXyoVKA[/url]

And the related comments that she's amazing and all her problems are down to a poor violin. There's some stuff on YouTube that I think cripes if she passed her exam then boy I've been overworking! Grade 8 should show excellent competence in the instrument, certainly shouldn't be hearing hesitations and big patches of dodgy intonation.

And things like this one where this extremely shaky rendition of a grade 7 piece is taken to be proof the girl is grade 7 standard. The mind boggles!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEjiC9X-eZ0

What do you think?
Stuart MF
Youtube is a great resource for visual learning and provides a very direct aid to teaching different aspects of music.

For instrumental teaching it has many uses as has already been said, it also is a great resource for a wide range of musical styles and performances.

Well done Youtube, just remember to pay artists their royalties! rolleyes.gif
river
QUOTE(Stuart MF @ Nov 6 2009, 11:53 AM) *
Well done Youtube, just remember to pay artists their royalties!


it's not YouTube's job to do that; the person uploading the video needs to make sure they have permission to do so. if it's copyrighted and the license requires royalties to be paid, it probably shouldn't be on YouTube to begin with.
Stuart MF
QUOTE(river @ Nov 6 2009, 11:56 AM) *

QUOTE(Stuart MF @ Nov 6 2009, 11:53 AM) *
Well done Youtube, just remember to pay artists their royalties!


it's not YouTube's job to do that; the person uploading the video needs to make sure they have permission to do so. if it's copyrighted and the license requires royalties to be paid, it probably shouldn't be on YouTube to begin with.


royalties dispute ends
Music
MUSIC VIDEOS BACK ON YOUTUBE AS SIX-MONTH ROYALTIES DISPUTE ENDS
Story Image


DISPUTE: YouTube blocked thousands of music videos to UK users in March

Thursday September 3,2009
By Emily Garnham for express.co.uk

Comment Speech Bubble Have your say(0)

A MUSIC video block on YouTube has been lifted after a six-month royalties row ended.

Songwriters’ association PRS for Music reached an agreement with the video-sharing website after a dispute over fees saw thousands of official music videos made unavailable to UK users from March.

Google-owned YouTube announced it will pay an undisclosed lump sum to PRS - backdated to January 2009 when the website's previous licence expired - in a deal which will last until 2012.

The deal with PRS, which collects licensing fees in the UK for 60,000 songwriting and publishing members, is understood to be worth millions of pounds

YouTube is expected to take around a week to reinstate the thousands of deleted music videos back on the site.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.