QUOTE(Vox Humana @ Oct 13 2011, 02:24 AM)

1. The system was developed not as a complete organ, but rather as software for organists who are computer geeks.
There is some truth in this statement, but Hauptwerk is, nevertheless, a viable system.
You mentioned Daniel Cook (presently at Salisbury) in one of your earlier posts. He is possibly the best person to talk to, as he worked with Hauptwerk on the sampling of Salisbury, and also builds complete systems in his spare time. He posts under his own name on the Hauptwerk forum. I understand that complete, working systems may be purchased for as little as 3,000 pounds, and can incorporate components, such as computers and keyboards, that you already own.
Daniel has also installed Hauptwerk in existing pipe organs (usually just for a recital) to provide 32' reeds (or similar) when none exist, and also fitted a (temporary) extra manual into the 3M Binns at Hartlepool. Some permanent 'hybrid' installations also exist.
In the case of the Hartlepool instrument, the electrical contacts on the peddleboard were wired to a MIDI device so that it could talk to the computer, and the additional manual (a keyboard from a Yamaha machine) was very neatly slotted into a space above the Swell.
May I clear up a couple of misunderstandings:
Firstly, it is possible to configure a system where Windows (or Mac) boots up into Hauptwerk, in exactly the same way that it is possible to get any computer to boot up into MS Word or similar. Equally, it is possible to configure the system so that pushing the ON/OFF button closes down Hauptwerk and shuts the computer down gracefully. All that is needed is to fit the computer ON/OFF button into the console.
Secondly, any Yamaha keyboard with a MIDI output can be used with Hauptwerk. These are readily available second-hand for a few pounds, and once the outer casing is removed they are quite compact, and easily slotted into a console. However, the peddleboard will need electrical contacts, and will need to be wired to a MIDI device as described above.
Thirdly, the Hauptwerk system does demand a lot of memory and processor power, but this need not be too expensive these days. However, if you are building a console it does make sense to have a dedicated computer, which is not slowed down by antivirus or other unwanted programmes. (AV is not needed if the computer is rarely or never connected to the internet.)
It also makes sense to use 64 bit Windows or the Apple Mac operating system, as these can address significantly more than the 3 gigabytes of memory seen by 32 bit Windows.
Less obviously, a dedicated graphics card is preferable, as integrated graphics cards use a significant proportion of system memory.
Finally, registration is probably the most difficult aspect of the Hauptwerk system. Ideally it could be installed into a redundant console [from an electronic or electro-pneumatic instrument], with the stops wired to a midi system. However, this is rarely practicable for most people. Touch screens can be fitted in place of stop jambs, and are actually much cheaper than draw stops. An possible alternative would be to set registration in advance on the computer, and to use the sequencer function.
Off the shelf systems such as Viscount, Allen (or on our case, Roland) may be neater and more convenient, but you get what you buy, and there is not likely to be the opportunity to 'play' different instruments from the same console. Additionally, the consoles for most of the ready built systems are quite large; being designed for church buildings or school halls. The Hauptwerk system does at least allow you to build a console to fit your home, rather than having some monstrosity take over the Dining Room!
SB