Hope you don't mind me venting about my piano exam, as I think my husband had enough of me twittering about it before the event, never mind a post mortem now.
The examiner was extremely pleasant, which made the experience more enjoyable, but which has been noted on these boards as Not A Good Sign. He made a point of telling me not to worry about page turns and to take my time, and at the end he told me how he really admires adults who have the courage and determination to learn an instrument and go through the exam process.
The piano was a Kemble - very bright and loud. Although it was wonderfully responsive (and in tune!) compared to my one, it seemed impossible to get much distinction between p and f. I started my first scale (B major) too high up the keyboard, and had to re-start lower down
Pieces - did the worst one first, which I knew would have slips - went into a blind panic and lost my place a few times but apart from that the playing was no worse than in my lessons. Second one, pedalling was a bit too smudgy but otherwise okay. Third one, two wrong notes but okay otherwise.
Sight reading was a lot easier than the specimen tests! Sight singing was really delightfully easy - phew! Aing-back, clap rhythm, cadence, etc. were not bad. Only bit that was a total disaster was the Aural D - "Tell me about the texture and tone of this piece" - my mind went blank and I certainly failed that component. I can't even answer that question in lessons, never mind in an exam. At least he didn't ask me to guess a composer, etc, as I couldn't tell you anything about the piece of music even now.
Wow, I feel better now. Thank you for allowing me to gibber!
Regards,
Fred xx
