QUOTE(Violinia @ Sep 11 2005, 07:26 PM)
I'm sure it would be advantageous for most children up to about 12, if the teacher is confident enough to be able to handle it with ease. I can very confident but not in all situations! Interacting with a child in front of their parent isn't one of my favourite activities! Perhaps I should attempt to get over this, for the sake of the child's learning..... but I probably won't get round to it in the near future.
However, for a teenager to have their parent there... hmmm. Surely by this age the child should be able to take a certain amount of responsibility for their own learning? And if not, why not?
One particular child I teach (she's now 16 so no longer a child) would have gained nothing whatsoever by having her mum in the room, god forbid! Lovely mum, but the child was so self-motivated and well-organised from the start she would never have had any need for additional support. Some children are just like this.
Having said all that I do develop very strong relationships with all the parents, and often have a little chat with them at the end of the lesson about what I've set the child to practise. If it's a technical thing I sometimes get the parent to learn it themselves so they can help the child during the week. I also stress when the child is young (6-9ish) that the parent supervise the practice by being there in the room making sure they practise everything in the practice notes, and do it properly. Small children, if left to their own devices, often think practice just means rushing through the pieces for a few minutes!
So good, working relationships with the parents are very important in my view. I know in a very full studio there isn't always time for this, and, yes, the last child in the day gets a better deal with all this stuff.
Violinia
Hmmm, wise words. My problem is - VN is independent and self-motivated but the teacher just happens to think that maybe given some parental supervision, she might do better? He suggested it to her directly. She nodded her head whilst there but at home, she steadfastly refused (stubborn nut!). This is the first and the ONLY time she has not taken on board his advice.
He's a very nice and good-natured man and does not insist on anything - other than technical perfection

. I noticed last week that she is allowed her own phrasing and fingering, too.
So we don't get to supervise her. *sigh* Hence her shaky sight-reading resulting from watching "Blue Peter" volumeless (a TV prog) and simultaneously playing from memory. Rascal. Hubby told me! But presently, she looks like she's doing fine so we lay back and kind of let things be... Provided VN does not fall in love, she may not need any parental supervision given her independent spirit.
However, come 13, I will certainly NOT sit in. My hubby may still want to - he's the one who on the advice of the teacher, takes notes!

- but I pray that he won't. It just does NOT feel right!

The kid will expect us to answer her questions for her - she's already pretty reserved outside the home and generally quite lazy to talk with non-family members!
I always say to myself and hubby - Don't mess about with teenagers! Beware of hormones.
Ooops! Sorry, TOO much rambling...