QUOTE(idiotmatthew @ Sep 26 2005, 05:27 PM)
QUOTE
The only problem I found with that, is that it is completely different to the others, e.g. The Guardian and the like. For example, one I looked at was ranked at number 5 in the Times, and 17 or something in the Guardian!
Yes, this is absolutely true. I don't know any "reliable" sources. The reason that they are different is their methods of adding up the marks are different. Oxford comes first in the UK and Cambridge the second -- the reason is only becos the faciliy spendings in oxford is lots more than that in cambridge. So the actual teaching might not be that good.
To be honest this is a bit of a mine-field and the rankings take into account all sorts of irrelevant things that technically make this department better than any other. My advice to anyone choosing a university is to go and look around the places and find somewhere you can stand to live for three years, this is the most important thing.
If you're not too fussed by that and want the most impressive degree I wouldn't bother with generally how good the department is just go for the university that people generally consider the best, this will be the most prestigious, after all employers won't be reading these tables to find out how good your degree is. For example, when I was at Durham the physics department was ranked number one in the country, but no doubt a Cambridge physics degree would be held with more prestige and this is where
most of the best physicists would go. Incidentally when I was at Durham all the best students (coming top of the exam rankings) were the people who chose to go to Durham who were streets ahead of the Oxbridge rejects.
Another good guide is what offers the place gives, if a university can command high grades for that subject it usually means that the department has a good reputation. At post graduate research level who you studied with is far more important than where you studied though: it's an entirely different matter.