Jump to content


Photo

Grim reaper strikes yet again


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 linda.ff

linda.ff

    Maestro

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8021 posts
  • Member: 183500
    Joined: 04-January 11
  • Cambridge

Posted 22 April 2016 - 20:15

http://www.digitalsp...verts-has-died/


  • 0

#2 chris13

chris13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 406 posts
  • Member: 7226
    Joined: 21-June 06
  • Lancaster; originally from Rhubarb Triangle Yorkshire

Posted 22 April 2016 - 20:29

RIP Choppers. Good age though, for a chimp.


  • 0

#3 chris13

chris13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 406 posts
  • Member: 7226
    Joined: 21-June 06
  • Lancaster; originally from Rhubarb Triangle Yorkshire

Posted 22 April 2016 - 20:52

BBC News - Why so many celebrities have died in 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk...t-arts-36108133

 

BBC now seem to think that only so called celebrity deaths matter !!!!


  • 0

#4 Aeolienne

Aeolienne

    Prodigy

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1836 posts
  • Member: 16983
    Joined: 27-September 07
  • Leamington Spa, Warks

Posted 09 May 2018 - 09:46

A more mundane (if slightly geeky) explanation is that this an example of statistical clustering, which is to be expected in any random process. I'm reminded of the case of the iPod Shuffle. Initially users complained that it wasn't random enough because it sometimes played two or more consecutive songs by the same artist. So Apple tweaked it to prevent this happening, which was effectively making the selection less random to sound more random. Go figure! 


  • 0

#5 chris13

chris13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 406 posts
  • Member: 7226
    Joined: 21-June 06
  • Lancaster; originally from Rhubarb Triangle Yorkshire

Posted 09 May 2018 - 11:41

The histogram of number of celebrity deaths reported in the BBC link above was produced for a Radio 4 programme called 'More or Less' so in my opinion the data sampling needs to be taken with a large pinch of salt. Still your post, Aeolienne, has given me cause to put brain into gear and to try to recall the little statistics that I have had to use in my working life. Also not geeky at all. Perhaps this thread could develop into 'The Statistics Thread' !


  • 0